Monday, August 2, 2010

Ghost sightings


Have you ever had the experience of seeing a ghost? Most, if not all paranormal investigators, believe that ghost sightings are real! So do we.

Now that may surprise some who have checked out our web site and found that we are Christians who believe that there are real, explainable, scientific answers for paranormal activity. We don't deny that there are sightings, we just don't believe these are ghosts or spirits of departed mortals who for one reason or another, manifest themselves to loved ones or total strangers.

We believe that the real,explainable, scientific answer is that these manifestations are demons. These demons masquerade as ghosts and even use voices, mannerisms and knowledge of the person they are role playing. We at Answers For The Paranormal are willing and able to unmask these frauds.

I want to leave you with this thought from the Bible:

It is appointed for man to die once and then face the judgment. Hebrews 9:27

Tomorrow I will develop this Scripture passage as it relates to ghost sightings. Goodnight and God bless you!

Bill

2 comments:

  1. This photo has nothing to do with Biblical magic but rather is simple physics. The shutter of the camera was open for a long exposure- probably approx. 1/2 second--1 second. When shutters of cameras are open for that length of time, any moving person or object will seem to have a 'ghostly' image, but in fact it is just not captured on the film or digital camera in a stationary or still position, so we get to see the subject moving, which gives us an unclear photo of the moving object. If you take the same photo with a faster shutter speed, the person to the right hand side of the girls will appear perfectly clear, and sharp as the rest of the image ( which is very shaky because the photographer couldn't hold the camera still for the length the shutter was open). And that's the only reason there is a ghostly sort of image in this photograph. Other's may have other reasons which I can explain on a one by one basis.

    ReplyDelete
  2. That makes no sense considering the other two people are perfectly solid. Even if the one person was moving the hand on the person would be more visible- or at least the arm of the visible person will be more vision. And its really hard to believe there wasn't one part of this third person that was completely visible and solid.
    If you want a "scientific" explaination why not just say Photoshop? It'd make quite a bit more sense.

    ReplyDelete